Posts Tagged ‘Technology’

The Stupidity of The Corporate IT Monolith

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

The following was sent to me by a Stupid Head, and I thought I would share it with you.

You tell me what is sadder:

1)  That a company of the size and scale of XXXXXX does not have the tools in place to allow its employees to open the new .docx format for MS Word requiring employees to send stuff home to open on their own PCs to convert.
2)  That a company of the size of Microsoft does such BALLSY MONOPOLISTIC moves such as creating new file extensions making it difficult if not impossible for users of “OLD” MS Office editions to open documents produced on their “NEW” office 2007 package.
3)  The fact that my little iPhone is able to open both .doc & .docx formats without even cracking a sweat.

The Stupidity of Supression – Part Deux

Sunday, March 15th, 2009

In my last rant I started talking about Barack Obama’s lifting of federal funding on stem cell research, but then got distracted talking about really stupid topics.

It is nice to see a US Government that does not have the bible thumpers leading them around by the short and curlys (of course I imagine that GWB doesn’t shave his sack – otherwise they would have had to grab onto the US Crown Jewels).

Stem cells will most probably lead to some of the greatest discoveries of our time.  If I was a betting man I would put money on stem cell research as it is bound to lead to a level of understanding of human biology that until now man has only dreamed of.  Once we understand how cell are created, specified, and behave we will be able to rationally design drugs and treatments that will help us nudge the nasty cells back to health.

Now assume that you have a child that is ill.  And that this child can be helped by a simple treatment that involves using stem cells to regenerate the damaged tissue/organ.  Why would it be wrong to grow and harvest these cells to help the healing process?  For those of you screaming, “Because it is against God’s will” please climb back under your rocks.  The slime from which you crawled from will definitely be more comforting for you.  A)  You never spoke to God, so you don’t know his will;  B) Your views of God’s will have been given to you by someone with a vested interest in your belief / faith / {en:tithe}; C)  Do you really think that if God (assuming you believe otherwise you wouldn’t really be following this thread) created beings with enough intelligence to discover all of these wonderful treatments that He would really want us sitting around whining, “God please help me” when he has already give us the power to help ourselves?

Throughout the years religion has tried to thwart scientific advances claiming that they were against the will of God.  It is a simple equation that relates the power of a church with the number of devout followers.  Since the number of followers is eroded as the need for faith to answer the unknown is diminished, anything that answers questions of the unknown are frowned upon by these groups.

So here is to one day being able to replaced damaged tissues or organs, with ones that are organic and NOT genetically modified.

Timmy out

The Stupidity of Supression

Saturday, March 14th, 2009

As you Stupid Heads already know, I generally like US President Barack Obama, except for the fact that I think he is a really big hypocrite on the aircraft usage issue by companies (please see the archives for that discussion).

I am now hailing him for lifting the ban on federal funding of {en:stem cell} research.  In a nut shell, stem cells are the body’s magical mystery cells.  They are cells that exist prior to functional specification and are capable of becoming any type of cell.  The controversy surrounding the use of stem cells arises from their source.  Although there are certain types of stem cells derived from adults, most stem cell research is based on embryonic stem cells derived from aborted human embryos.

This rant isn’t about the pros or cons of abortion.  I assume that each and every Stupid Head can make that decision for themselves – I am talking about what happens once it is done.

Of course his Holiless Pope Eggs Benedict is completely against this move as being un-Catholic and evil and nasty and and…  It is really not Popi’s fault of course, as Pope, he is morally obliged to stand in the way of science.  Look at how the church treated {en: Galileo Galilei}.  How dare a mere mortal come up with a theory?!  Let’s persecute him and shut him up…it is the will of God.  In researching this rant I came across some references to speeches made by Popi before his popeification where his takes a typical papal stance and refers to the whole Galileo affair as, “a symptomatic case that permits us to see how deep the self-doubt of the modern age, of science and technology goes today”.

What about saying, “We screwed up being time and we are sorry. Galileo was right.”  It wasn’t until 1992 when Pope John Paul II expressed regret for how the Galileo affair was handled, and officially conceded that the Earth was not stationary, as the result of a study conducted by the Pontifical Council for Culture.  Helloooooo?  I think that we had a pretty good idea that Galileo was right going back as far as 1991.

Why be so opposed to progress and scientific advancement?  Because.  The power of the Catholic Church is based directly on faith, and faith, in general, is based on ignorance.  We don’t know why something is so we attribute it to God.  Why is the sky blue?  God made it that way.  Why do people die?  God wants to bring them home.  Why do bad things happen to good people?  God has a cruel side.

Unfortunately this whole anti-scientific approach is actually quite an insult to God.  Think about it.  If God is all great and almighty could he not create a being with an inherent intelligence capable of discovering all of the hidden mysteries out there?  I would think so.

This all reminds of me Douglas Adam’s treatise on God and faith, which basically states that if God proved his existence, then faith would be destroyed as people would know it is a fact.  Since faith is destroyed God ceases to exist as his “power” is derived from the faith people have.  Thus, God has proven himself to not exist.  QED.

What this means is that Popi and his friends want to keep the Catholic Church strong so that they can continue to collect money, hoard it in the Vatican and spend money spreading the word in Africa that condoms are bad.

Timmy out

The Stupidity of Youth

Saturday, March 7th, 2009

A recent survey conducted by German Broadband association Bitkom found that 84 percent of 19-29 year olds said they would rather do without their current partner or an automobile than forgo their connection to the Web.  Living without a mobile phone was also unthinkable for 97 percent.

Now most people would tell you that I am somewhat attached to my internet connection and all sorts of tech gadgets, however, I would neither give up my wife nor my car for the web.  An affirmative answer to a question regarding willingness to give up partner and or car can only be made by someone who lives in their parent’s basement and is intimately involved with one or both of the palm sisters.  If a romantic stroll means walking to the bathroom for the hand cream and your keyboard has a neoprene cover then I can understand the answer the prediliction for technology.

GROW UP!  Period.  If a majority of people, and we are referring to more than a 4:1 ratio, would give up their partner and/or car to play World of Warcraft then we have a serious social issue.  If human intercouse is so unappealing to 84% of those about to enter the workforce then the world is a very screwed up place we are placing out future in a very precarious position.

As for the unthinkable of living without a cell phone statistic … *shakes head*  The need, and I stress need, for a cell phone is completely fabricated by the cell phone industry.  Because I am an analytical type, I have kept a detailed list of all of the times that having a cell phone has allowed me to get a job, intervene in a medical emergency, prevented someone from sustaining injury, or allowed me to significantly benefit in some other way.  In order to get included on my list the lack of a cell phone would have had to cause me to loose out on the particular opportunity.

To date, with close to 15 years of cell phone use my list comprises exactly 0 items.  Nil.  Nada.  Zip.  Zilch.  That is not to say that it hasn’t been very convenient on several occasions, but to say that life without it would be unthinkable is absurd.

Many of the problems in todays modern world are due to the fact that people cannot or will not interact in a meaningful way.  Unfortunately, while technology allows us to pass information around more efficiently, it is removing our ability to communicated effeciently, if at all.

Timmy Out.